MARCH 2014: TEAMS STATISTICS. NBA REGULAR SEASON.
Team statistics: Best
ATTACK / EFFICIENCY / DEFENSE in NBA regular season: March 2014.
Just to remind you, I put the introduction of my part 1 and the link to the article (if you want to access the statistics that I use to elect the G.O.A.T of every decade).
The most impressive statistic of the month is the
winning streak of the San Antonio Spurs (16 in a row). The team, led by Tim Duncan, Tony Parker
and Manu Ginobili, ultimately won 19 in a row which is winning streak N°8 in NBA history
of the regular season
(link to the data).
However, including playoffs, we
must remember that the Spurs made 20 in row in 2012, which is the winning
streak N°5 in NBA history including the regular season and the playoffs (link to the data).
Few days ago, I looked at the most impressive
statistics for players in March 2014 (link to the article). As in
February, my screening revealed Lebron James and Kevin Durant among the best in attack/efficiency and Joakim Noah as one of the best defensive players.
I’m now screening for the best
team in terms of attack and defense for the same month, according to
statistics.
A. ATTACK/EFFICIENCY.
First, I focus on (a) best attack
based on superior efficiency (high field goal % implying more points).
Secondly, I screen for (b) the most efficient attack (low level of turnovers
and few steals by opponents) that we can also traduce by the most intelligent
teamwork play (with many assists to find the open guy).
Rk
|
Season
|
Tm
|
W
|
L
|
ORtg ▾
|
DRtg
|
1
|
2013-14
|
LAC
|
54
|
23
|
111.9
|
104.7
|
2
|
2013-14
|
POR
|
49
|
27
|
111.7
|
107.3
|
3
|
2013-14
|
MIA
|
52
|
22
|
111.4
|
105.3
|
4
|
2013-14
|
DAL
|
45
|
31
|
111.3
|
108.8
|
5
|
2013-14
|
SAS
|
59
|
17
|
110.7
|
101.9
|
In March 2014, the San Antonio Spurs, which are
currently fifth in offensive rating (for the whole regular season) reached the
top of my first statistic.
Meanwhile, the Washington Wizards
(as in February), appeared in my two sets of statistics. The team is
currently in sixth position in the Eastern conference.
a. In 2013-14, in the regular season, game played in
March, team won game, requiring 2-PT Field Goal Pct ≥ 0.5 and 3-Pt Field Goal
Pct ≥ 0.45 and Points ≥ 110, sorted by most games matching criteria. RESULTS
for at least 2.
Rk
|
Tm
|
Count
|
1
|
SAS
|
4
|
2
|
MEM
|
3
|
3
|
PHO
|
3
|
4
|
DEN
|
2
|
5
|
HOU
|
2
|
6
|
OKC
|
2
|
7
|
WAS
|
2
|
b. In 2013-14, in the regular season, game played in March, team won game, requiring Turnovers ≤ 8 and Assists ≥ 20 and Opponent
Steals ≤ 8, sorted by most games in season matching criteria. RESULTS for at
least 1.
Rk
|
Tm
|
Count
|
1
|
CHA
|
3
|
2
|
CHI
|
2
|
3
|
NYK
|
2
|
4
|
ATL
|
1
|
5
|
BOS
|
1
|
6
|
LAC
|
1
|
7
|
MIA
|
1
|
8
|
MIN
|
1
|
9
|
NOP
|
1
|
10
|
WAS
|
1
|
B. DEFENSE.
On defense, I focus on positive
pressure on attack that leads to: (a) low level of field goal % and (b)
turnovers, steals and few opportunities in term of offensive rebounds by the
opponent team (implying little second chances).
Rk
|
Season
|
Tm
|
W
|
L
|
ORtg
|
DRtg ▴
|
1
|
2013-14
|
IND
|
53
|
23
|
103.9
|
98.5
|
2
|
2013-14
|
CHI
|
43
|
32
|
102.0
|
100.5
|
3
|
2013-14
|
SAS
|
59
|
17
|
110.7
|
101.9
|
4
|
2013-14
|
GSW
|
46
|
29
|
107.0
|
102.8
|
5
|
2013-14
|
OKC
|
55
|
19
|
110.3
|
103.2
|
In March 2014, 6 teams reached my two sets of
statistics. Of course, the San Antonio Spurs, which are currently third in
defensive rating (for the whole regular season) reached the top of my two
statistics.
I also found the Chicago Bulls,
the Los Angeles Clippers, Oklahoma City Thunder, the Minnesota Timberwolves and
the Washington Wizards.
a. in 2013-14, in the regular season, game played in
March, team won game, requiring Opponent Points ≤ 85 and Opponent 2-Pt Field
Goal Pct ≤ 0.45 and Opponent 3-Pt Field Goal Pct ≤ 0.25, sorted by most games
matching criteria.
Rk
|
Tm
|
Count
|
1
|
POR
|
2
|
2
|
SAS
|
2
|
3
|
CHI
|
1
|
4
|
IND
|
1
|
5
|
LAC
|
1
|
6
|
MIN
|
1
|
7
|
OKC
|
1
|
8
|
ORL
|
1
|
9
|
PHO
|
1
|
10
|
WAS
|
1
|
b. In 2013-14, in the regular season, game played in March, team won game, requiring Steals ≥ 8 and Opponent Turnovers ≥ 8 and
Opponent Offensive Rebounds ≤ 12, sorted by most games in season matching
criteria. RESULTS for at least 4.
Rk
|
Tm
|
Count
|
1
|
BRK
|
7
|
2
|
SAS
|
7
|
3
|
TOR
|
7
|
4
|
LAC
|
5
|
5
|
MEM
|
5
|
6
|
MIN
|
5
|
7
|
NOP
|
5
|
8
|
CHI
|
4
|
9
|
DAL
|
4
|
10
|
DEN
|
4
|
11
|
OKC
|
4
|
12
|
WAS
|
4
|
COMING SOON: PART 4:
THE G.O.A.T of the 90's...
Just to remind you, I put the introduction of my part 1 and the link to the article (if you want to access the statistics that I use to elect the G.O.A.T of every decade).
What I wanted
to look at for a long time was: What do the statistics say about who should be
the Greatest of All Time (G.O.A.T)? Effectively, outside of statistics, we all
have a point of view about who is/was/should be considered the G.O.AT. Just to
name a few that are widely considered as a reference over the decades:
<< Home